Let me take a little detour from the main topic. Some people say that this article is written in soft paper. I don't really care whether they're right or not, and I'm definitely not angry about it.
Some believe that Logitech Master and Pennefather MT720 aren't on the same level. While the Master has a better ratio, there's no doubt that the MT750 has its flaws. In fact, the Master seems to have fully surpassed it, so I'm not just blowing smoke here.
Others think these comparisons are just raising the profile of the Master and Pennefather. But honestly, do I need to blow Logitech? Does the Master even want me to talk about it?
If you've chosen the appearance of the Master, the purpose is pretty clear. Why can't we compare them fairly?
The definition of "soft paper" shouldn’t be about blowing things up. The number of people who posted about it was huge. Everyone had their own advantages, and everything became part of the conversation. Maybe I'm still too young, but what I want to say is that when I first got into this community, I didn’t know much about it. After using it for a while, I realized I didn’t need to write about it anymore. I could just observe and experience it directly.
In summary, let’s look at some wireless mice available in the 170-220 yuan range.
Most of them are small mice or basic models with limited features, but the price is really good. A 200-yuan wireless mouse with this design and performance is fully acceptable. After all, the look is more stylish, and the feel and function are also decent.
Of course, the MT720 has its obvious drawbacks. Compared to the Master, besides weight, the only difference is the price.
So, if you’re looking for an office mouse in this range, this is a solid choice.
If you’re willing to spend more, you might consider the Master 2S, which costs about four and a half times more. However, I wouldn’t recommend the Master itself. Its DPI is only 1600, which isn’t enough for me, especially since I use a dual 1080P monitor.
If you’re not willing to spend that much, the Pennefather MT750 is still a good option.
After all, it’s about value for money.
Appearance & Feel
What I’m bringing to you today is the Pennefather MT750.
I think many people would react like me—when I first saw the MT750, I thought, “Is this even a Logitech Master?â€
So, I’m going to compare this lower-end version of the Master to the success of the original.
▲ First, let’s look at the specifications of both products. Overall, they are very similar. The MT750 is slightly shorter, narrower, and taller than the Master, but the grip feels almost the same. My hand length is 17.5 cm.
Then, let’s take a closer look at the details of both.
▲ Now, let’s check the weights. The Master weighs 150.5g, while the MT750 is only 116.1g. That’s a significant difference. The weight of the Master has always been a challenge for many users.
â–² Next, look at the left and right buttons. Both are split buttons, but their shapes are quite different. The MT750 has a decorative aluminum strip in the middle, giving it a more premium look.
The Master’s buttons are crisper, with stronger springback and fewer empty clicks.
▲ The Master’s DPI button makes a quieter sound, while the MT750’s is crisper and more noticeable.
▲ The scroll wheel is made of metal and rubber, but the Master has a groove in the middle. In my experience, I haven’t found a smoother scroll wheel than the one on the Logitech Master. The MT750’s wheel is average—there’s a bit of a rough feeling and some strange noises when scrolling.
▲ Looking at the front of both, they are similar. Both use a micro USB port, which makes charging easy—just plug in your phone’s data cable.
▲ Now, looking at the sides. The Master has three LED indicators, while the MT750 doesn’t. This feels a bit like a disadvantage because you can’t see the battery level in real time, which makes it less reliable.
▲ The side scroll wheel on the Master is completely silent with strong damping. The MT750’s is more like a regular mouse wheel.
▲ The side buttons on the Master are arranged vertically in a triangular shape. The MT750’s are placed front and back. Because there’s a measuring roller in front, there’s less space for the side buttons, making them harder to press without looking.
▲ The non-slip pattern on the bottom: I preferred the Master’s diamond-cut design over the simple triangle. The anti-slip effect is similar, though.
â–² The tail and right side of the two look different, but overall, they both look fine.
▲ Four non-slip feet are used on the bottom. The positions and shapes are quite different. The Master has two U-shaped grooves, while the MT750 has a flat surface. Personally, I prefer the Master’s design.
Also, the Master has instructions next to each key, while the MT750 doesn’t. However, this feature doesn’t make a big difference in daily use.
Performance
Now, let’s move on to performance.
Both products support a 1Torr 4 design, which means 2.4G plus three Bluetooth connections. I don’t have much to say about the Master’s performance. I mainly want to test how the MT750 performs.
For 2.4G, the receiver can be plugged in easily.
Bluetooth connection is also fast. Just open your computer, find the device, press the switch button on the mouse, select the channel you want to save, then press the code key. Your computer will detect the Pennefather mouse and connect automatically.
â–² Switching between multiple devices is smooth. It takes just a second, and you can use it immediately after pressing the mouse.
▲ The driver allows customizing the buttons, but only through built-in presets. You can’t set custom key combinations or macros. Also, the changes only work when connected via 2.4G, and the driver resets to default when disconnected. That’s a bit of a downside.
Rental Led Video Wall,Lightweight LED Message Display,Flexible Curve LED Video Wall,waterproof Rental LED video billboard,Stable Stage Video Screen Backdrop,Stage rental LED screen panel
Shenzhen Xinfei Century Technology Co., Ltd. , https://www.rgbdancing.com